Free Word download β’ Edit online β’ Save & share with Drive β’ Export to PDF
A Board Resolution Affirming Non-Discrimination Policy is a formal governance document by which an organization's board of directors officially adopts and places on record its commitment to equal treatment across all protected classes in employment, service delivery, and organizational activities. The resolution cites applicable federal, state, and local anti-discrimination laws, adopts the organization's written non-discrimination policy by reference, defines who is covered, establishes enforcement responsibility, and records the board vote and date of adoption as a permanent entry in the corporate minutes. It functions as the bridge between an internal policy and a verified, board-level commitment that external parties β funders, regulators, and accreditors β can rely on.
Without a board-adopted resolution, a non-discrimination policy is an internal document with no formal governance backing β and many funders, government agencies, and grant programs will not accept it as evidence of organizational commitment. Federal grant compliance reviewers, state nonprofit oversight bodies, and accreditation programs routinely require a signed, dated board resolution as a condition of eligibility, approval, or continued funding. For organizations applying for 501(c)(3) status, a board-adopted non-discrimination policy is part of demonstrating that the organization operates for public benefit rather than private interest. Beyond compliance, the resolution creates the organizational accountability structure β naming who receives complaints, how investigations are conducted, and when the policy must be reviewed β that transforms a document into an enforceable standard. This template gives any board the structure to adopt a complete, defensible resolution in a single meeting.
| If your situation is⦠| Use this template |
|---|---|
| Nonprofit organization seeking 501(c)(3) status or grant funding | Board Resolution Affirming Non-Discrimination Policy |
| Corporation adopting a standalone EEO policy for the employee handbook | Equal Employment Opportunity Policy |
| Organization adopting a broader DEI commitment beyond legal minimums | Diversity and Inclusion Policy |
| Board formally adopting an anti-harassment and anti-retaliation policy | Anti-Harassment Policy |
| Board ratifying any major operational policy as a standing resolution | General Board Resolution Template |
| Board adopting a written code of conduct covering all protected-class protections | Code of Ethics and Conduct |
Why it matters: A resolution that references a policy document 'attached hereto' but lacks the attachment is incomplete. Grant reviewers and regulators will reject it, and the policy is unenforceable without its full text on record.
Fix: Finalize the non-discrimination policy document before the board meeting, attach it as Exhibit A, and store both documents together as a single file in the corporate records.
Why it matters: A resolution passed without a documented quorum can be challenged as invalid under the organization's bylaws, exposing the board to liability and forcing a re-vote.
Fix: Record the total number of directors seated, the number present, and confirm the quorum requirement is met in the preamble before the operative clauses.
Why it matters: Omitting sexual orientation and gender identity β now covered under federal law since 2020 β signals non-compliance to funders and government agencies reviewing the policy.
Fix: Update the list to reflect the current federal standard plus all applicable state and local additions, and include a catch-all phrase: 'or any other characteristic protected by applicable law.'
Why it matters: If a discrimination complaint involves the executive director or a board member, there is no independent path for the complainant to escalate β creating both a practical and legal conflict of interest.
Fix: Name a secondary designee (board chair, HR officer, or ombudsperson) and specify the escalation path when the primary recipient is implicated in the complaint.
Why it matters: A resolution filed only in the minute book has no operational effect. Federal and state funders require evidence that the policy was actually communicated to covered parties.
Fix: Include an explicit directive naming the responsible officer and the deadline for distribution to all employees, volunteers, and contractors, and require annual acknowledgment signatures.
Why it matters: Anti-discrimination law changes regularly; a policy with no review provision becomes outdated silently, exposing the organization to liability for failing to cover newly protected classes.
Fix: Add a review provision requiring the board to revisit the policy at least every two to three years, or sooner upon any material change in applicable law.
Replace all [ORGANIZATION LEGAL NAME] placeholders with the exact registered name. Enter the meeting type (regular or special), date, and location or virtual platform.
π‘ Cross-check the name against your state corporate registry or IRS determination letter β a mismatch can delay grant approvals.
Enter the names of directors present, confirm the total meets your bylaw quorum requirement, and note any directors participating remotely if your bylaws permit it.
π‘ If your bylaws require written notice for special meetings, attach a copy of the notice to the resolution file as supporting documentation.
Add the specific federal, state, and local statutes that apply to your organization and jurisdiction. Include any funder or grant program requirements that mandate a non-discrimination commitment.
π‘ Nonprofits applying for federal grants should reference the applicable program's civil rights statutes (e.g., Title VI, Section 504, Title IX) in the recitals to satisfy compliance reviewers.
Start from the federal floor (Title VII, ADA, ADEA, GINA, Bostock) and add state and local protected classes applicable to your location β common additions include sexual orientation, gender identity, source of income, and familial status.
π‘ Check your state's Fair Employment Practices Agency (FEPA) statute for protected classes that exceed the federal minimum β many states add 10 or more additional categories.
The resolution adopts the policy by reference β so the actual policy document must be attached. If your organization does not yet have a written policy, draft it before the board meeting.
π‘ Version-stamp the attached policy (e.g., 'Non-Discrimination Policy v1.0, adopted [DATE]') so future amendments are clearly distinguishable from the originally adopted version.
Name the title (not just a personal name) of the primary complaint recipient and an alternate for situations involving senior leadership. Enter the contact method β email address or phone β for reporting.
π‘ Using a title rather than a personal name means the designation remains valid when staff turn over, without requiring a board amendment.
Enter the numeric vote tally (in favor, opposed, abstaining), the date of adoption, and have the board secretary sign the certification block.
π‘ File the executed resolution with your corporate minute book within five business days of the meeting β delayed filing creates gaps that surface in due diligence and audits.
Send the adopted resolution and attached policy to all employees, volunteers, and contractors. Set a calendar reminder for the review date specified in the amendment provision.
π‘ Store the executed PDF in a centrally accessible location and include the resolution number or date in the filename for easy retrieval during grant audits.
A board resolution affirming a non-discrimination policy is a formal written decision by an organization's board of directors that officially adopts the organization's commitment to equal treatment for all protected classes. It records the board's vote, cites the applicable laws, adopts the policy document by reference, and creates an official entry in the board minutes. It is commonly required by grant funders, government agencies, and accreditation bodies as proof that non-discrimination is a board-level commitment rather than an informal practice.
Many federal and state grant programs, as well as the IRS 501(c)(3) application process, require proof that an organization's board has formally adopted a non-discrimination policy. A signed resolution included in board minutes provides that documented evidence. Without it, grant applications may be rejected or tax-exempt status delayed. Some funders require the resolution to be re-adopted or reaffirmed each grant cycle.
At minimum, the resolution should cover all classes protected by federal law: race, color, religion, sex (including pregnancy), national origin, age (40 and over), disability, genetic information, and β following Bostock v. Clayton County (2020) β sexual orientation and gender identity. Many state and local laws add additional classes such as marital status, veteran status, source of income, and familial status. Including a catch-all phrase covering any characteristic protected by applicable law future-proofs the policy against subsequent statutory changes.
A board resolution is a formal governance document that demonstrates organizational commitment and satisfies many regulatory and funder requirements, but it does not substitute for compliance with applicable employment law. The organization remains subject to Title VII, the ADA, state fair employment statutes, and other applicable law regardless of whether a resolution exists. The resolution is evidence of good-faith adoption of the policy, which can be relevant in regulatory investigations and litigation.
Best practice is a formal board review every two to three years, or sooner when applicable law changes β for example, when a state legislature adds new protected classes or when a court decision expands existing protections. Some grant programs and accreditation bodies require annual reaffirmation. Including a review provision in the resolution itself ensures the board schedules this proactively rather than reactively.
Any organization with a board of directors β including for-profit corporations, LLCs with a board structure, cooperatives, and community organizations β can use this resolution. For-profit businesses may need it to satisfy investor due diligence, government contracting requirements, or workplace certification programs. It is most commonly used by nonprofits because of grant-funding requirements, but the document structure is equally appropriate for any board-governed entity.
The non-discrimination policy is the substantive document that defines protected classes, scope, complaint procedures, and enforcement. The board resolution is the governance act by which the board formally adopts that policy β creating a dated, voted, and certified record of the board's decision. The two documents work together: the resolution references and attaches the policy, and the policy is what employees and stakeholders actually follow. Neither document is complete without the other.
Typically only the board secretary β or in some organizations the board chair β signs the certification block confirming that the resolution was duly adopted. All members do not need to sign individually, but the vote tally (in favor, opposed, and abstaining) should be recorded to confirm the resolution passed with a proper majority. Check your organization's bylaws, which may specify signatory requirements for board resolutions.
File the signed resolution in the corporate minute book, attach it to the board meeting minutes, distribute the attached policy to all employees, volunteers, and contractors, and store a signed acknowledgment from each covered party. For nonprofits, keep a copy readily accessible for grant applications and regulatory audits. Set a calendar reminder for the review date specified in the resolution's amendment provision.
The non-discrimination policy is the operative document defining scope, protected classes, and complaint procedures. The board resolution is the governance act that formally adopts it. The policy tells employees what the rules are; the resolution creates the official corporate record that the board decided to follow those rules. Both documents are needed β the resolution is incomplete without the attached policy, and the policy lacks board-level authority without the resolution.
An EEO policy focuses specifically on employment decisions β hiring, promotion, compensation, and termination. A non-discrimination policy is broader, covering employees, clients, volunteers, and program participants in all organizational activities. The board resolution can adopt either or both, depending on the organization's obligations and funder requirements.
A code of conduct covers the full range of behavioral expectations β conflicts of interest, confidentiality, financial integrity, and non-discrimination among them. A board resolution affirming a non-discrimination policy is narrower and more specific, creating a standalone record of the board's commitment on this single issue. Grant applications and regulatory filings typically require the specific resolution, not a general code of conduct.
Board minutes are the comprehensive record of everything discussed and decided at a meeting. A resolution is a discrete, self-contained document recording one specific board action that is excerpted into the minutes. Funders and agencies prefer to receive the standalone resolution rather than full meeting minutes because it isolates the specific commitment without disclosing unrelated board deliberations.
Federal and state grant funders routinely require a board-adopted non-discrimination resolution as part of the grant application or compliance audit, making this document a prerequisite for funding eligibility.
Federal contractors subject to Executive Order 11246 and related regulations must maintain board-level documentation of equal employment opportunity commitments as part of their affirmative action program.
Healthcare organizations receiving Medicare, Medicaid, or federal grant funding are required under Section 1557 of the ACA to have adopted non-discrimination policies covering patients and employees, typically evidenced by a board resolution.
Private schools, universities, and educational nonprofits must adopt board-level non-discrimination resolutions to comply with Title VI, Title IX, and Section 504 as conditions of federal financial assistance.
| Path | Best for | Cost | Time |
|---|---|---|---|
| Use the template | Nonprofits, small businesses, and any board-governed organization adopting a standard non-discrimination policy for the first time or reaffirming an existing one | Free | 30β60 minutes to complete; adopted at the next board meeting |
| Template + professional review | Organizations with complex grant compliance requirements, government contracting obligations, or operating in multiple jurisdictions with different protected-class statutes | $200β$500 for a one-hour HR attorney or compliance consultant review | 1β3 days |
| Custom drafted | Large employers, federally regulated industries, or organizations facing active EEOC investigations or litigation where the resolution language requires specific legal precision | $500β$2,000+ | 1β2 weeks |
This document is one of 3,000+ business & legal templates included in Business in a Box.
Access over 3,000+ business and legal templates for any business task, project or initiative.
Customize your ready-made business document template and save it in the cloud.
Share your files and folders with your team. Create a space of seamless collaboration.
"Fantastic value! I'm not sure how I'd do without it. It's worth its weight in gold and paid back for itself many times."
"I have been using Business in a Box for years. It has been the most useful source of templates I have encountered. I recommend it to anyone."
"It has been a life saver so many times I have lost count. Business in a Box has saved me so much time and as you know, time is money."
Stop downloading documents. Start operating with clarity. Business in a Box gives you the Business Operating System used by over 250,000 companies worldwide to structure, run, and grow their business.
Free Forever PlanΒ Β·Β No credit card required
