Free Word download • Edit online • Save & share with Drive • Export to PDF
A Guarantee and Postponement of Claims is a legally binding agreement in which a related-party creditor — typically a shareholder, director, or affiliated entity that has advanced money to a company — simultaneously guarantees the company's debt to a senior lender and agrees to subordinate their own claims against the company until that senior debt is fully repaid. The document combines two distinct legal mechanisms: the guarantee creates a personal obligation requiring the guarantor to pay the lender directly if the borrower defaults; the postponement controls the priority waterfall by preventing the insider creditor from collecting their loan ahead of the senior lender, including in insolvency proceedings. Together, they give the lender both a recovery right and structural priority over competing insider debt.
Without a properly executed guarantee and postponement of claims, a lender extending credit to a company that carries shareholder or director loans on its balance sheet faces two simultaneous risks: the borrower may default without the lender having a direct recovery right against the individual behind the company, and the insider creditor may demand repayment of their own loan — legally and without restriction — before the senior lender is paid. Either event can leave the lender exposed on a facility that appeared fully secured at closing. The postponement provisions are particularly critical in insolvency: without a documented subordination and turnover obligation, the insider creditor participates in the distribution of the borrower's estate on equal footing with the senior lender, potentially absorbing assets that should have satisfied the senior debt first. This template provides a structured, lender-ready starting point covering all core mechanics — guarantee, postponement, permitted payments, waiver of defenses, and turnover — so that all parties enter the transaction with clear, enforceable obligations documented before the first dollar is advanced.
| If your situation is… | Use this template |
|---|---|
| Shareholder loan must be subordinated to a bank credit facility | Guarantee and Postponement of Claims |
| Personal guarantee only, without a postponement of insider claims | Personal Guarantee Agreement |
| Seller note must rank behind acquisition debt in priority | Subordination Agreement |
| Multiple creditors agreeing on a priority waterfall | Intercreditor Agreement |
| Guarantor seeks to limit exposure to a fixed maximum amount | Limited Guarantee Agreement |
| Corporate parent guaranteeing a subsidiary's obligations | Corporate Guarantee Agreement |
| Guarantee required alongside a loan agreement for an SME borrower | Loan Agreement with Personal Guarantee |
Why it matters: If the postponement clause is limited to named existing loans, any new advance the guarantor makes to the borrower after signing falls outside the subordination and ranks equally with the senior lender.
Fix: Draft the postponement to cover all present and future claims the guarantor holds or may acquire against the borrower, not just a scheduled list of current advances.
Why it matters: Without a turnover obligation, a guarantor who receives a payment from the borrower in violation of the postponement — including in insolvency — has no contractual duty to hand it to the lender. The lender's only remedy becomes a damages claim, which may itself rank behind other creditors.
Fix: Include an express provision that any prohibited payment received by the guarantor is held in trust for the lender and must be paid over immediately, with this obligation surviving insolvency proceedings.
Why it matters: A guarantee capped at the principal loan amount leaves the lender exposed to all accrued interest, default interest, enforcement fees, and legal costs — which can exceed 20–30% of principal on a defaulted facility.
Fix: Draft the guarantee to cover principal, interest at the contracted rate, default interest, all fees, and enforcement costs including legal fees on a full indemnity basis.
Why it matters: In the UK, Canada, and Australia, personal guarantees signed by a spouse, domestic partner, or financially unsophisticated individual are vulnerable to being set aside for undue influence or non est factum if there is no evidence of independent advice.
Fix: Require the guarantor to obtain a certificate from independent counsel confirming the nature and effect of the guarantee and postponement before execution, and attach it to the executed agreement.
In plain language: Identifies the lender, the borrower, and the guarantor by their full legal names, and summarizes the commercial context — the loan or credit facility being supported.
THIS GUARANTEE AND POSTPONEMENT OF CLAIMS is made as of [DATE] among [LENDER LEGAL NAME] ('Lender'), [BORROWER LEGAL NAME] ('Borrower'), and [GUARANTOR FULL NAME / ENTITY] ('Guarantor').
Common mistake: Using a trade name or informal description instead of the registered legal name for any party. A mismatch between the agreement and corporate registry records can complicate enforcement or create an argument that the wrong entity signed.
In plain language: The guarantor unconditionally guarantees to the lender that the borrower will perform all obligations under the principal debt instrument — including repayment of principal, interest, fees, and costs.
The Guarantor hereby unconditionally and irrevocably guarantees to the Lender the due and punctual payment and performance of all present and future obligations of the Borrower under the [CREDIT AGREEMENT / LOAN AGREEMENT] dated [DATE] ('Principal Debt'), including principal, interest at [RATE]%, fees, and all enforcement costs.
Common mistake: Limiting the guarantee to the original principal amount and omitting interest, default interest, fees, and enforcement costs. The lender ends up bearing those amounts even if the guarantee is called.
In plain language: Deems the guarantor to be liable as a primary obligor rather than a secondary surety, preventing the guarantor from claiming that the lender must first pursue the borrower before making demand.
The Guarantor's obligations under this Agreement are those of a principal obligor and not merely a surety. The Lender may demand payment from the Guarantor without first making demand upon, or exhausting its remedies against, the Borrower.
Common mistake: Omitting the principal obligor clause and leaving the guarantee as a true secondary suretyship. The lender then faces procedural hurdles — and potentially statute-of-limitations issues — before it can collect from the guarantor.
In plain language: The guarantor agrees that all amounts the borrower owes to the guarantor — including shareholder loans, director advances, and intercompany receivables — are postponed and subordinated to the senior debt until it is fully discharged.
The Guarantor hereby postpones and subordinates to the Lender all claims, debts, liabilities, and obligations now or hereafter owing by the Borrower to the Guarantor (the 'Postponed Claims'), including without limitation the shareholder loan of $[AMOUNT] dated [DATE], until all obligations under the Principal Debt have been unconditionally and irrevocably discharged in full.
Common mistake: Drafting the postponement to cover only currently existing insider loans and failing to capture future advances. The borrower then takes a new shareholder loan after signing, which falls outside the postponement and ranks pari passu with the senior lender.
In plain language: Prohibits the guarantor from collecting, assigning, or taking security over the postponed claims without the lender's prior written consent while the senior debt remains outstanding.
Until the Principal Debt has been fully discharged, the Guarantor shall not, without the Lender's prior written consent: (a) demand, accept, or receive any payment of or on account of any Postponed Claim; (b) assign, encumber, or otherwise deal with any Postponed Claim; or (c) exercise any right of set-off in respect of any Postponed Claim.
Common mistake: Restricting only cash repayment and overlooking set-off, assignment, and the granting of security over the insider claim. A guarantor who assigns the postponed claim to a third party can circumvent the entire subordination.
In plain language: Carves out circumstances under which the guarantor may receive repayment of the postponed claims — typically ordinary-course management fees or salary, or repayment once the lender confirms the borrower is not in default.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Borrower may pay the Guarantor: (a) salary and reasonable management fees not to exceed $[AMOUNT] per [month/year] in the ordinary course of business; and (b) amounts in respect of Postponed Claims where the Lender has provided prior written confirmation that no Event of Default exists and no such payment would cause one.
Common mistake: No permitted-payment carve-out at all, which creates a commercially unworkable arrangement if the guarantor is also a working director drawing a salary. Lenders who omit this often face pushback at signing or non-compliance post-closing.
In plain language: The guarantor waives all defenses that would otherwise reduce or extinguish liability under the guarantee — including changes to the loan terms, time granted to the borrower, release of co-guarantors, and failure by the lender to enforce security.
The Guarantor's obligations under this Agreement shall not be affected by: (a) any amendment, restatement, or waiver of the Principal Debt; (b) any time, indulgence, or concession granted to the Borrower; (c) the release or discharge of any other guarantor or co-obligor; or (d) the failure, delay, or inability of the Lender to enforce any security held for the Principal Debt.
Common mistake: Partial waiver language that only addresses common-law defenses and omits statutory defenses available in the applicable jurisdiction. In several Canadian provinces and UK courts, statutory rights of surety must be expressly waived to be excluded.
In plain language: Requires the guarantor to hold in trust and immediately pay over to the lender any amounts they receive in violation of the postponement, including in insolvency proceedings.
If the Guarantor receives any payment or distribution in respect of any Postponed Claim in contravention of this Agreement, including in any insolvency, bankruptcy, or winding-up proceeding, the Guarantor shall hold such amount in trust for the Lender and immediately pay it over to the Lender to be applied against the Principal Debt.
Common mistake: No turnover or trust mechanism. Without it, a guarantor who improperly receives a payment in insolvency simply keeps it — the subordination exists on paper but provides no practical remedy.
In plain language: A standalone indemnity under which the guarantor agrees to reimburse the lender on a full indemnity basis for all costs, losses, and expenses arising from the borrower's default, regardless of whether the guarantee itself is enforceable.
As a separate and independent obligation, the Guarantor agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the Lender from and against all losses, damages, costs (including legal fees on a full indemnity basis), and expenses incurred by the Lender arising from or in connection with any failure by the Borrower to perform any obligation under the Principal Debt.
Common mistake: Omitting the indemnity as a separate obligation. If the guarantee is found unenforceable for any technical reason — e.g., lack of consideration or a defect in execution — the lender has no fallback recovery right without a freestanding indemnity.
In plain language: Specifies which jurisdiction's law governs the agreement, where disputes will be resolved, and the execution formalities — including independent legal advice requirements where applicable.
This Agreement is governed by the laws of [PROVINCE / STATE / COUNTRY] and the parties submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of [JURISDICTION]. The Guarantor acknowledges having received independent legal advice prior to execution.
Common mistake: No acknowledgment of independent legal advice in jurisdictions where its absence can void a personal guarantee. In the UK and several Canadian provinces, a guarantee signed without evidence of independent advice is vulnerable to being set aside on grounds of undue influence, particularly where the guarantor is a spouse or domestic partner of the borrower.
Enter the full registered legal names of the lender, borrower, and guarantor. For corporate entities, confirm the jurisdiction of incorporation. For individuals, use the name as it appears on government-issued ID.
💡 Cross-reference the guarantor's name with the register of directors or shareholders to confirm they have authority to grant the guarantee and postponement.
Insert the exact name, date, and key terms of the underlying loan or credit agreement — the principal amount, interest rate, and maturity date. This anchors the scope of the guarantee and postponement to a defined obligation.
💡 Attach the principal loan agreement as a schedule if the lender requires it, so the guarantor cannot later claim they were unaware of the full debt terms.
List every current loan, advance, or intercompany receivable that the borrower owes to the guarantor — with amount, date, and instrument reference. These become the defined 'Postponed Claims' in the postponement clause.
💡 Run a full intercompany receivables reconciliation before drafting. A single unlisted insider loan can undermine the lender's priority position.
Decide whether the guarantee is unlimited (covering all present and future obligations) or capped at a specific maximum amount. Insert the cap in the guarantee clause if a limit is agreed.
💡 Lenders typically prefer unlimited guarantees. If the guarantor negotiates a cap, set it above the total principal plus 18 months of projected interest and fees to avoid gaps.
Agree with the lender on what the guarantor may receive from the borrower during the postponement period — typically salary and reasonable management fees up to a defined annual amount — and insert the agreed figures.
💡 Express the permitted salary or management fee as an annual dollar cap rather than 'reasonable compensation' — the latter is indefinite and invites disputes.
Review the waiver-of-defenses clause against the statutory rights of sureties in the governing jurisdiction. In Canada and the UK, certain statutory protections must be expressly named and waived.
💡 Have local counsel confirm the waiver language is sufficient for the governing province or country before execution — a partial waiver is worse than none because it creates false certainty.
In most lender policies, the guarantor must obtain independent legal advice before signing. Document this with a lawyer's certificate or an acknowledgment signed by the guarantor confirming they received and understood independent advice.
💡 Many banks will not register or rely on a personal guarantee without a completed ILA certificate. Build this step into the closing checklist at the outset, not the day before signing.
All parties must sign the agreement before or at the same time as the underlying loan is funded. Provide each party with a fully executed original or certified copy. Store the executed copy alongside the principal debt instrument.
💡 Use Business in a Box eSign to timestamp execution and ensure the guarantor and lender receive simultaneous copies — avoiding any argument about which version was the operative final document.
A guarantee and postponement of claims is a legal agreement in which a related-party creditor — typically a shareholder or director who has loaned money to a company — both guarantees the company's debt to a senior lender and agrees to defer collecting their own loan until the senior debt is fully repaid. It combines two distinct protections in a single document: the lender gains a guarantee against default and assurance that the insider creditor will not be repaid ahead of them.
Lenders require this document because insider loans — made by shareholders or directors — create a competing claim against the borrower's assets. Without postponement, the insider creditor could demand repayment before the senior lender is paid, draining the borrower's cash or triggering insolvency with the senior lender left partially unpaid. The guarantee component provides a personal recovery right against the guarantor if the borrower defaults.
A guarantee is a promise by the guarantor to pay the lender if the borrower does not. A postponement of claims is a promise by the guarantor not to collect any money the borrower owes them until the lender is fully repaid. They address different risks: the guarantee addresses insolvency of the borrower; the postponement addresses the risk that the borrower repays the insider ahead of the lender. A combined agreement addresses both simultaneously.
Yes, when properly executed, a guarantee and postponement of claims is generally enforceable in common-law jurisdictions including the US, Canada, the UK, and Australia. Enforceability depends on the guarantor having capacity, sufficient consideration existing, proper execution formalities being followed, and the guarantor having received independent legal advice where required. Courts in several jurisdictions have set aside guarantees where these conditions were not met.
Yes. A guarantor can negotiate a financial cap — for example, limiting the guarantee to a maximum of $[AMOUNT] — while the postponement of claims remains unlimited. Lenders typically accept a cap on the guarantee at or above the full principal amount, though they generally resist capping it below the principal. The permitted-payments carve-out can also limit the practical scope of the postponement by allowing the guarantor to receive salary and management fees during the loan term.
In insolvency, the postponement and turnover provisions become critical. If the guarantor has been correctly documented as a subordinated creditor, their claim against the borrower's estate ranks below the senior lender's in the distribution waterfall. If the guarantor receives any payment from the insolvency estate in violation of the postponement, the turnover clause requires them to hold it in trust and pay it immediately to the senior lender. This is why a properly drafted turnover provision is essential.
In most jurisdictions it is strongly advisable, and in some it is effectively required for the guarantee to be enforceable. In the UK and Canada, personal guarantees — particularly those given by a spouse, domestic partner, or director with limited bargaining power — are routinely challenged on grounds of undue influence or misrepresentation where independent advice was not obtained. Most institutional lenders require a signed certificate from independent counsel before accepting a personal guarantee.
A permitted payment is an agreed carve-out in the postponement clause allowing the guarantor to receive specified payments from the borrower during the postponement period despite the general prohibition. Common permitted payments include salary for the guarantor's role as an employee or director, and management fees up to a defined annual cap. These carve-outs are negotiated at the time of drafting and must be expressly stated in the agreement — they do not arise by implication.
A subordination agreement addresses only the priority ranking of debts — it makes one creditor's claim rank below another's. A guarantee and postponement of claims does that and more: it also creates a personal guarantee obligation requiring the guarantor to pay the lender directly if the borrower defaults. The combined document is more common in SME lending where the insider creditor is also a director or shareholder with personal assets available to support the guarantee.
A personal guarantee agreement creates a guarantor's obligation to repay the lender if the borrower defaults, but does not address the priority of the guarantor's own claims against the borrower. A guarantee and postponement of claims adds the subordination component, making it the correct document whenever the guarantor also holds insider debt. Use a standalone personal guarantee only when the guarantor has no existing loans to the borrower.
A subordination agreement deals exclusively with the ranking of one creditor's debt below another's — it contains no guarantee. A guarantee and postponement of claims combines subordination with a personal recovery right against the guarantor. Where the lender needs both protections — priority over insider debt and a personal backstop — the combined document is required.
A corporate guarantee is given by a legal entity — typically a parent company — guaranteeing a subsidiary's debt. It contains no postponement mechanics because a parent typically does not hold consumer or shareholder loans against the subsidiary in the same way an individual director does. Use a corporate guarantee for parent-subsidiary support structures; use a guarantee and postponement when the guarantor is an individual insider creditor.
A loan agreement governs the terms of the debt between lender and borrower — principal, interest, covenants, and events of default. A guarantee and postponement of claims is a collateral document that supports the loan agreement by securing a personal recovery right and controlling insider debt priority. Both documents are typically executed simultaneously at loan closing.
Standard condition precedent to any SME credit facility where the borrowing entity has outstanding shareholder or director loans on its balance sheet.
Seller notes and management loans in leveraged buyouts must be formally subordinated to acquisition debt through a guarantee and postponement structure.
Developer shareholder loans are routinely postponed behind construction lender facilities, with the developer also providing a personal guarantee for cost overruns.
Firm partners who have made capital contributions structured as loans must postpone those claims to external credit lines secured against the practice.
In the US, guarantee enforceability is primarily governed by state law and the Uniform Commercial Code. Many states require guarantees to be in writing and signed to satisfy the Statute of Frauds. Subordination of insider debt is recognized under bankruptcy law — Section 510 of the Bankruptcy Code allows courts to enforce contractual subordination agreements against a debtor's estate. California and New York have specific anti-deficiency and suretyship protection rules that must be addressed in the waiver-of-defenses clause.
Each Canadian province has its own Guarantees Acknowledgment or equivalent legislation requiring that personal guarantees be signed before a notary or commissioner of oaths, with the guarantor formally acknowledging they understand the nature of the document. Ontario's Statute of Frauds requires guarantees to be in writing. Postponement agreements are enforceable in insolvency under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act and the Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act, provided they are properly registered where required. Quebec guarantees are governed by the Civil Code and follow suretyship rules distinct from common-law provinces.
UK personal guarantees are governed by common law and the Statute of Frauds 1677, which requires them to be in writing and signed by the guarantor. The rule in Royal Bank of Scotland v. Etridge (No. 2) [2001] requires lenders to take steps to ensure a guarantor — particularly a spouse or cohabitant — has received independent legal advice before relying on the guarantee. Postponement provisions are enforceable in administration and liquidation under the Insolvency Act 1986, subject to the anti-avoidance provisions for transactions at an undervalue.
EU member states treat personal guarantees and subordination agreements under their respective national contract and insolvency laws — there is no harmonized EU guarantee regime. Germany, France, and the Netherlands each have distinct formality requirements and creditor-protection rules. In cross-border EU transactions, the governing law clause is critical: EU Regulation 593/2008 (Rome I) determines which national law applies to the guarantee obligations, while insolvency proceedings are governed by the EU Insolvency Regulation 2015/848. GDPR considerations arise where the agreement involves processing personal data of individual guarantors.
| Path | Best for | Cost | Time |
|---|---|---|---|
| Use the template | Straightforward SME lending transactions where the lender is a domestic bank and the guarantor is a single shareholder with a simple insider loan | Free | 30–60 minutes |
| Template + legal review | Transactions involving multiple guarantors, cross-border elements, complex intercompany debt structures, or a guarantor who is a spouse or domestic partner | $500–$1,500 | 2–5 days |
| Custom drafted | Leveraged buyouts, syndicated facilities, multi-jurisdictional structures, or any transaction where enforcement of the postponement in insolvency is a primary concern | $2,000–$8,000+ | 1–3 weeks |
This document is one of 3,000+ business & legal templates included in Business in a Box.
Access over 3,000+ business and legal templates for any business task, project or initiative.
Customize your ready-made business document template and save it in the cloud.
Share your files and folders with your team. Create a space of seamless collaboration.
"Fantastic value! I'm not sure how I'd do without it. It's worth its weight in gold and paid back for itself many times."
"I have been using Business in a Box for years. It has been the most useful source of templates I have encountered. I recommend it to anyone."
"It has been a life saver so many times I have lost count. Business in a Box has saved me so much time and as you know, time is money."
Stop downloading documents. Start operating with clarity. Business in a Box gives you the Business Operating System used by over 250,000 companies worldwide to structure, run, and grow their business.
Free Forever Plan · No credit card required
