Free Word download β’ Edit online β’ Save & share with Drive β’ Export to PDF
A Resubmission of Proposal is a formal business document used to present a revised version of an original proposal that was rejected, returned with feedback, or not accepted on first review. It differs from a new proposal in one critical way: it is explicitly structured as a response to prior evaluation, mapping each piece of reviewer feedback to a specific revision and presenting the updated scope, pricing, and timeline in a single, traceable document. Reviewers β whether clients, procurement committees, or grant funders β use the resubmission to verify that identified deficiencies have been addressed before deciding whether to proceed.
Sending back a revised proposal without a structured resubmission document is one of the most common reasons second-round bids fail. Reviewers managing multiple submissions need to confirm compliance quickly β if they cannot trace each feedback item to a specific revision, they score the resubmission as non-responsive and move on. A professionally formatted resubmission signals that you read the feedback carefully, acted on it specifically, and can be trusted to manage a real engagement with the same rigor. Beyond winning the immediate bid, a disciplined resubmission process protects you commercially: clearly documenting scope changes and pricing rationale eliminates the ambiguity that leads to disputes after contract award. This template gives you the structure to turn a rejection into a second, stronger chance β without starting from a blank page.
| If your situation is⦠| Use this template |
|---|---|
| Responding to a formal RFP rejection with reviewer comments | Resubmission of Proposal |
| Submitting a completely new proposal to a client who rejected the first | Business Proposal |
| Revising only the pricing section after a cost objection | Price Quotation |
| Following up on a proposal with no feedback received | Proposal Follow-Up Letter |
| Resubmitting a grant application with required amendments | Grant Proposal |
| Providing a formal written response to a contract negotiation counter-offer | Counter Proposal Letter |
| Sending a revised scope of work after project terms change | Scope of Work |
Why it matters: Reviewers managing multiple bids cannot verify compliance without a direct mapping of feedback to revisions. An unstructured resubmission risks being scored as non-responsive.
Fix: Build a table that lists each feedback item, the specific change made in response, and the section number where the revision appears.
Why it matters: If the opening section is identical to the original, it signals to reviewers that the rest of the document may also be superficially revised, undermining confidence in the whole submission.
Fix: Rewrite the executive summary to explicitly reference the revision, name the key changes made, and restate the value proposition in light of the updated scope.
Why it matters: Cutting the fee without removing deliverables creates a contract expectation mismatch β you are committed to the original scope at a lower margin, which typically results in scope disputes or under-delivery.
Fix: Tie every price reduction to a specific scope item removed or effort reduced, and document it clearly in both the pricing section and the summary of changes.
Why it matters: A timeline anchored to a start date that has already passed signals the resubmission was assembled hastily without genuine review, and it creates an unworkable schedule from day one.
Fix: Recalculate all milestone dates from a new assumed contract execution date, and state that assumption explicitly in the timeline section.
Why it matters: Statements like 'our team has extensive experience' without supporting evidence do not satisfy reviewer concerns about team qualifications or methodology β and may be scored as non-responsive.
Fix: Attach concrete evidence for every qualitative objection: case studies, client references, certifications, sample deliverables, or third-party validations.
Why it matters: Adding scope that was not in the original proposal or requested by the reviewer can trigger a re-evaluation process, disqualify the submission in a formal procurement, or confuse the client about what they are being asked to approve.
Fix: Limit revisions strictly to the items flagged in reviewer feedback. If you believe an addition strengthens the proposal, flag it as optional and price it separately.
Before opening the template, collect every piece of formal feedback β deficiency notices, evaluation scorecards, email comments, or verbal notes reduced to writing. Number each item so you can cross-reference it in the summary of changes.
π‘ If feedback was delivered verbally, send a written recap to the reviewer for confirmation before starting revisions β misremembering a single objection can invalidate the whole resubmission.
Enter the original proposal number, original submission date, and the date feedback was received. State explicitly that this document is a resubmission β not a new proposal β so it is routed correctly by the reviewing body.
π‘ Reference any formal deficiency notice number if one was issued β procurement bodies track resubmissions by deficiency notice, not by original proposal number.
List every feedback item in column one, your specific response in column two, and the section number where the change appears in column three. This table is the most important section for busy reviewers.
π‘ If you chose not to act on a piece of feedback, explain why β a documented rationale is far better than silence, which looks like an oversight.
Update the scope to reflect all additions, removals, and modifications. Use tracked changes or a clear notation (e.g., [REVISED], [ADDED], [REMOVED]) so the reviewer does not have to compare two documents side by side.
π‘ Limit scope changes to those directly tied to feedback. Introducing new, unrequested elements in a resubmission can reopen the evaluation process unnecessarily.
Recalculate all milestone dates from a revised contract execution date that accounts for the time elapsed since original submission. Confirm with your delivery team that the revised schedule is achievable before submitting.
π‘ Add a one-sentence assumption statement under the timeline: 'All dates assume contract execution by [DATE].' This protects you if the client delays further.
Update the fee schedule to reflect any scope changes, and add a brief rationale for each line that changed. If price increased, justify it; if it decreased, specify exactly what was removed.
π‘ Present a side-by-side comparison table (original vs. revised) for proposals with more than three pricing line items β it removes ambiguity and demonstrates transparency.
Close with a concise paragraph confirming that all feedback has been addressed, restating the core benefit you deliver, and proposing a specific next step with a named contact and deadline.
π‘ Set the follow-up deadline 5β7 business days out β long enough to be reasonable, short enough to keep momentum.
Compile appendices β case studies, certifications, updated CVs, references β that were requested or support your responses to qualitative objections. Export the final document as PDF and retain the editable Word file for your records.
π‘ Label appendices by the feedback item they address (e.g., 'Appendix B β Response to Objection 3: Team Experience') so reviewers can navigate directly to supporting evidence.
A resubmission of proposal is a formal document presenting a revised version of an original proposal that was rejected, returned for revision, or otherwise not accepted on first submission. It acknowledges the prior submission, maps reviewer feedback to specific revisions, and presents an updated scope, timeline, and pricing for reconsideration. It is distinct from a new proposal because it is explicitly framed as a response to prior evaluation.
Resubmit when the reviewing body has explicitly invited revision, issued a deficiency notice, or indicated the original proposal was conditionally unsuccessful pending corrections. Submit a new proposal when the original solicitation has closed, the client relationship has reset, or the project scope has changed so substantially that the original submission is no longer relevant. A resubmission without an invitation from the reviewer can appear presumptuous in formal procurement contexts.
A resubmission of proposal is a full document that includes a revised proposal body β updated scope, timeline, pricing, and team β alongside a structured response to reviewer feedback. A cover letter is a single-page opener that introduces the attached proposal but does not itself contain the substantive content. A resubmission may include a cover letter as its opening section, but the two are not the same document.
Yes, including feedback you chose not to act on. If a reviewer flagged an item and you determined no change was necessary, document your rationale in the summary of changes. Silence on a feedback point is interpreted as an oversight, not a deliberate decision, and can result in the resubmission being scored as non-responsive on that criterion.
A resubmission is typically comparable in length to the original proposal, plus an additional 1β2 pages for the cover statement and summary of changes. Avoid padding the document with new content that was not requested β reviewers compare it directly against the original and lengthy additions can introduce new questions rather than resolve existing ones.
Yes, but any pricing change should be directly tied to a scope or commercial terms change and explained clearly. In competitive procurement processes, some issuing bodies restrict pricing revisions to those that are directly responsive to a deficiency notice β check the original RFP or solicitation rules before adjusting fees unilaterally.
A three-column table is the most effective format: column one lists the feedback item or deficiency, column two describes the specific revision made, and column three references the section number where the change appears. This format lets reviewers verify compliance quickly without reading the entire document again.
A resubmission of proposal is generally not legally binding on its own β it becomes binding only when the issuing party formally accepts it, typically through a signed contract, purchase order, or award letter. In formal government and institutional procurement, the accepted proposal may be incorporated by reference into the resulting contract, making accuracy of scope, timeline, and pricing in the resubmission commercially significant.
A business proposal is an original document presenting a solution, scope, and price for the first time. A resubmission of proposal is explicitly a response to prior reviewer feedback on an earlier submission. The resubmission includes a summary of changes and point-by-point feedback responses that a first-round proposal does not. Use the standard business proposal for new opportunities and the resubmission template when a reviewer has returned your original with comments.
A proposal cover letter is a single-page document that introduces an attached proposal β it does not contain the substantive scope, pricing, or team sections. A resubmission of proposal is a complete document that incorporates the cover statement, feedback responses, and the fully revised proposal body in one file. Use a cover letter to open a fresh proposal; use the resubmission template when the full document needs to address and document prior feedback.
A scope of work defines deliverables, tasks, and responsibilities for a project β it is a component of a proposal, not a standalone response to rejection. A resubmission of proposal wraps the updated scope of work inside a broader document that also addresses reviewer feedback, revises commercial terms, and restates the value proposition. Update the scope of work as part of the resubmission; do not send a revised scope alone as a substitute for a complete resubmission.
A counter proposal letter responds to a specific offer or negotiated position from the other party, proposing amended terms for mutual agreement. A resubmission of proposal responds to an evaluation body's deficiency findings and invites reconsideration through a formal review process. Counter proposals are used in bilateral negotiation; resubmissions are used in structured procurement or grant-evaluation contexts.
Consultancies frequently resubmit proposals after procurement committees request rate adjustments, additional CVs, or revised methodology documentation.
Contractors resubmit bids after design clarifications or value-engineering requests that require a revised bill of quantities and updated schedule.
Software vendors revise proposals to address security review findings, updated integration requirements, or revised implementation timelines requested by IT procurement.
Grant applicants resubmit after funders request amended budgets, additional evaluation metrics, or clarified program logic before approving funding.
| Path | Best for | Cost | Time |
|---|---|---|---|
| Use the template | Consultants, freelancers, and small businesses resubmitting to clients or small procurement processes | Free | 2β4 hours |
| Template + professional review | Mid-market companies resubmitting to corporate procurement or competitive RFP processes above $50K | $200β$800 for a business writing or proposal specialist review | 1β2 days |
| Custom drafted | Government contractors, institutional grant applicants, or enterprise vendors resubmitting to high-value formal solicitations | $1,500β$5,000 for a professional proposal writer or bid consultant | 3β7 days |
This document is one of 3,000+ business & legal templates included in Business in a Box.
Access over 3,000+ business and legal templates for any business task, project or initiative.
Customize your ready-made business document template and save it in the cloud.
Share your files and folders with your team. Create a space of seamless collaboration.
"Fantastic value! I'm not sure how I'd do without it. It's worth its weight in gold and paid back for itself many times."
"I have been using Business in a Box for years. It has been the most useful source of templates I have encountered. I recommend it to anyone."
"It has been a life saver so many times I have lost count. Business in a Box has saved me so much time and as you know, time is money."
Stop downloading documents. Start operating with clarity. Business in a Box gives you the Business Operating System used by over 250,000 companies worldwide to structure, run, and grow their business.
Start freeΒ Β·Β No credit card required
